One report, page by page
This is the exact structure of every Synthetic Focus Group Report, filled with an illustrative run: a handmade ceramic mug listing, 50 personas, verdict FIXABLE. Your report follows the same eight sections, 8 to 10 PDF pages.
The verdict, first
Product URL, date, "50 AI shoppers reviewed this page" and the one word you paid for, with a single sentence of reasoning. No burying the lede.
The interest is real but trust is in the way: 19 of 50 personas raised a trust objection and 38% walk away. The five fixes on page 6 are worth making before a single euro goes to ads.
Six metrics, no vibes
Averages across all responding personas plus the raw buy split. Every persona answers the same structured questions, so these numbers are arithmetic, not impressions.
Three paragraphs of plain language
What works, what stops buyers, what to do first: written from the aggregate numbers, not from any single opinion. From the sample run:
“The product itself is not the problem: clarity scores 7.1 and the impulse segment averages 7.8, which means the photo and the headline are doing their job. The page loses people in the thirty seconds after the first impression, when 19 of 50 went looking for a reason to believe you and found neither reviews, nor a returns policy, nor a name behind the store. Fix trust first: the five changes on page 6 are all light or medium effort, and four of them are additions of a single sentence.”From the sample report · section 3 of 8
Why they walk away, ranked
Every objection lands in one of six categories. Under each bar: the sharpest quote from that category.
“No reviews, no returns policy, and a countdown timer? I have seen this movie before. Closing the tab.”
“If it truly ships in 3 days, say it at the top. That one line is the difference between me buying now or never.”
“34 euros for a mug is fine. 34 euros for a mug with one photo and no story is not.”
“Is it dishwasher safe? I read the whole page twice. I still do not know.”
“Grey text on white, I simply cannot read this on my phone in daylight.”
“Lovely mug. I own eleven. Nothing here tells me why this is the twelfth.”
Ten quotes, names attached
One per archetype, chosen for specificity. Four of the ten from the sample run:
“No reviews, no returns policy, and a countdown timer? I have seen this movie before. Closing the tab.”Margaret Doyle, 58, UK · The Skeptic · would buy: no
“The photo sold me in two seconds. Then I scrolled for the price, kept scrolling, and lost the feeling.”Tasha Nguyen, 24, US · The Impulse Buyer · would buy: maybe
“It says premium materials. Which materials? At this price I can name three competitors that tell me.”Tom Brandt, 41, DE · The Comparison Shopper · would buy: no
“If it truly ships in 3 days, say it at the top. That one line is the difference between me buying now or never.”Warren Blake, 55, AU · The Gift Buyer · would buy: maybe
What to change, in order
Derived from the "what would convince you" answers: each fix names how many personas asked for it and how much work it is. The real report lists ten; here are the top five from the sample run.
Every archetype, one line each
Average purchase intent per archetype, with a one-line read. This is where you see who you are winning and who you are losing.
What this is, and what it is not
Every report ends the same way: these are structured AI simulations of buyer reactions, not real customers and not a guarantee of sales. They are harsher and more specific than your friends, and they read every word. The full reasoning is on the methodology page.
Run your own jury for 15 EUR
Fifty personas, this exact report, in your inbox in about 30 minutes. Or apply your fixes and re-test with the 3-pack: same jury, comparable scores.